Roman Catholic Church Scandal Expands· March 31, 2010

      On March 24, the New York Times reported that the priestly sex scandal may have implicated the pope. The Vatican, including Cardinal Ratzinger who is now pope, did not defrock, or in any other way discipline a Wisconsin priest who sexually molested more than 200 boys from 1950-1974. Several American Bishops warned the Vatican, even writing to Cardinal Ratzinger himself, who was in charge of the process of dealing with sexual predator priests.

      The New York Times reported that documents obtained from the discovery phase of a lawsuit filed in Wisconsin clearly suggest “that while church officials tussled over whether the priest should be dismissed, their highest priority was protecting the church from scandal.”

      The Pope is also accused of not reporting sex-offending priests to German civilian authorities while he was an archbishop in Germany and while he was head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome, where he was the Vatican’s chief doctrinal enforcer.

      But the case in Wisconsin involving Father Lawrence Murphy was only one of thousands forwarded to the Vatican over decades to the Congregation.

      Cardinal Ratzinger did not respond to two letters from American bishops to start a secret tribunal that would have led to Murphy’s removal from the priesthood. But Cardinal Bertone, the second in command at the Congregation started the trial process and then halted it after the priest wrote a letter to Ratzinger asking for leniency because of his age and health. “Three successive archbishops in Wisconsin,” said the New York Times, “were told that Father Murphy was sexually abusing children, the documents show, but never reported it to criminal or civil authorities.” Apparently the first two bishops didn’t even report the matter to Rome.

      The church tried to keep the recently released documents secret, but was forced to release them under lawsuit discovery. Moreover, civil authorities also did not prosecute Father Murphy even though they had complaints from the victims themselves. No doubt many wonder if there was some sort of priestly intervention to prevent criminal prosecution in civil courts to avoid exposure. But so far that has not been discussed in the press.

      Instead of being disciplined, Father Murphy was quietly moved to another place where he worked with children for an additional 24 years.

      “Even as the pope himself in a recent letter to Irish Catholics has emphasized the need to cooperate with civil justice in abuse cases,” wrote the Times, “the correspondence seems to indicate that the Vatican’s insistence on secrecy has often impeded such cooperation.”

      Father [Federico] Lombardi, a Vatican spokesman, said that church law does not prohibit church officials from reporting child abuse to civil authorities. Why it never happened in the Wisconsin case, or in thousands of other cases, is one of the questions begin raised about Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI. Lombardi said, “the Code of Canon Law does not envision automatic penalties.”

      While from a church law standpoint there may be flexibility to deal with problems, the neglect, or cover up of these cases, and efforts to keep them secret, have greatly tainted the churches reputation.

      “The Vatican’s inaction is not unusual,” said the Times. “Only 20 percent of the 3,000 accused priests whose cases went to the church’s doctrinal office between 2001 and 2010 were given full church trials, and only some of those were defrocked… an additional 10 percent were defrocked immediately. Ten percent left voluntarily. But a majority — 60 percent — faced other ‘administrative and disciplinary provisions…’ like being prohibited from celebrating Mass.”

      The rather mild disciplinary approach of the Vatican toward sex abusers was no doubt a contributing factor to the wide-spread problem around the world.

      After the death of Father Murphy, and in face of a lawsuit, Archbishop Weakland wrote to Cardinal Bertone in which he said that “we are still hoping we can avoid undue publicity that would be negative toward the church.”

      The Vatican tried to defend the inaction against Father Murphy, saying that by the time the Vatican knew about the problem in 1998 he was old and sick. But this only raises more questions. If that is in fact true that Murphy molested the children, why didn’t the Vatican know about a known sex offender before then? Why didn’t the local diocese deal with him? His victims actually alerted the police. When they did find out about it, they merely transferred him to another diocese to work with, and potentially molest, more children.

      The Vatican also suggested that it would have handled the matter differently today and that more recent policies would have precluded a continuation of the problem. Mechanisms, however, were already in place to deal with sex offenders appropriately, though in disuse, according to press reports. Why didn’t the Church use the existing structure to deal with these cases? Were these recent, supposedly better policies put in place because the Church has reformed itself, or because society is much more demanding and investigative?

      Now that the scandal has reached the heart of the church, to the pope himself, it is clear that the Church is at a crossroads. Marco Politi, a veteran Vatican journalist said, “Up to now [the scandal] was far away — in the States, in Canada, in Brazil, in Australia. Then it came to Europe, to Ireland. Then it came tao his motherland. Then it came to his diocese, and now it’s coming to the heart of the government of the church — and he has to give an answer.”

      “Last weekend, in a heartfelt letter to Irish Catholics reeling from reports of decades of systemic sexual abuse,” wrote the New York Times in another article, “Benedict apologized but did not discipline any church leaders who had covered up abuses, fueling growing anger in Ireland.”

      “As archbishop of Munich and Freising from 1977 to 1982, the future pope approved the transfer to Munich for psychiatric treatment of a priest who had sexually abused boys. The priest… was quickly returned to pastoral work with children.”

      The church has lashed out at her accusers in defense saying that the expanding scandal is an “elaborate personal attack on the pope.” The Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, said the New York Times article was written “with the clear and ignoble intent of trying to strike Benedict and his closest collaborators at any cost.”

      Such allegations are likely self-serving. The Vatican obviously is unhappy about the unwelcome and spreading exposure to many countries. The increasing concern is that Cardinal Ratzinger was deeply involved in the attempted cover-up.

      Some might argue that the liberal news organizations are unfairly criticizing the Catholic Church, since similar things go on in other churches too.

      There are at least two reasons why this is not a valid defense. First, the Catholic Church claims to be the moral leader of the world. Rome is much more than a mere church. It is a political power, and a powerful one at that. She stands before the world in white vestments claiming to be the ethical and moral guide of nations, kindreds, tongues and people. Her responsibility therefore is greater than other churches that are not political organizations. Rome’s double standard is now being scrutinized by the court of public opinion. Perhaps it would surprise no one that many people despise religion because of that very double standard.

      Secondly, though other churches that make high spiritual and moral claims have their cases of abuse, immorality, and vice, the Catholic system of celibate priests as well as male and female monastic orders is unnatural and lends itself to sexual immorality and abuse. The culture of secrecy also aids and abets predator priests. Sexual abuse has become so endemic and so prolific that it cannot be classed as mere individual or isolated lapses in morality. It is a systemic problem, and therefore deserves more scrutiny and accountability in the public arena than other churches.

      “Since January,” wrote the liberal Huffington Post, “more than 300 former Catholic school students and others have stepped forward with abuse claims and the church has seen it’s poll numbers fall drastically.

      “According to Stern magazine, Only 17 percent of Germans polled said that they still trust the Catholic church, compared to 29 percent in late January, just before the first abuse cases there were made public.”

      Sources:

      1

      2

      3

      4

      5

      6